Most Valuable LeBron

    LeBron James is undoubtedly one of the biggest stars in NBA history, and he has four MVP awards to prove it. Earlier this month, after Stephen Curry was named the first unanimous MVP in NBA history (Curry's second straight MVP award), LeBron got a lot of grief regarding his comments about the status of the award. The problem is: He's exactly right.

James, a 4x MVP, averaged 25 points, 7 rebounds
and 7 assists this season

    Every league likes to have a villain, and somehow, LeBron is viewed as the villain of the NBA. People love to hate LeBron. But in this case, let's give him a break. His comments were that the term "Most Valuable Player" needs to be re-evaluated. It came across to the public like LeBron James was being petty about coming in 3rd in the MVP voting, behind Curry and the Spurs' Kawhi Leonard. In James's defense, he did say that Stephen Curry was deserving and even cited his stats and said that there was no question who the best player was this year.

    There's the problem. The award is not called "Best Player", it's called the "Most Valuable Player". If you look at those two titles at face value, there's an obvious difference. Curry was definitely the best player in the NBA this year, averaging 30 points, leading the league in steals, and becoming the first player in NBA history to make 400 3-pointers in a season (shattering his own NBA record by over 100), but he was not the most valuable.



Harper: 1st MVP voting- Nationals (83-79)
Goldschmidt 2nd- Diamondbacks (79-83)
Votto 3rd- Reds (64-98)

   Anyone who has heard my podcast, Empire Sports Talk, knows that I had a similar gripe about this same thing at the end of baseball season. The Most Valuable Player award is given to the best player in the league for a given year. However, the title is misleading. The league's best player should be rewarded, but under a title that is just that, best player. Most Valuable Player paints a picture of the league's most irreplaceable player, the person whose team would be nothing without them, or at least that's how it should be defined. Last year in the MLB, as was the subject of the podcast in question, titled "V is for Valuable", Bryce Harper of the Washington Nationals won the National League MVP award. He was the best player, numbers-wise, but he, along with the other two candidates for the award, Paul Goldschmidt of the Arizona Diamondbacks and Joey Votto of the Cincinnati Reds, were on teams that missed the playoffs.
    Now, let me pose this question for perspective: How "valuable" were these players to their teams if, even with them and their numbers, they still didn't make the playoffs-and in the case of Goldschmidt and Votto, they weren't even close?

    I'm not so naïve as to believe that these guys could make these teams good by themselves, because it's baseball and baseball is heavily a team sport, but still. Sticking with baseball, in the American League, Toronto Blue Jays third baseman Josh Donaldson took home the MVP award. In this case, the Blue Jays did make the playoffs and without Donaldson's numbers, they probably wouldn't have. THAT is the definition of valuable. There IS a difference between Most Valuable and Best.



Leonard: Back-to-back
Defensive Player of the year (2015-16)

    So, back to LeBron. Given the example above, LeBron James probably was the Most Valuable Player this year. Why? Kwahi Leonard may be the best player on his otherwise aging team, and let it be said that I'm not ignoring the fact that he did win Defensive Player of the Year...again, but as of right now, he's not even the leader of his team. Until he retires, the Spurs are still Tim Duncan's team. Would the Spurs have made the playoffs without Kwahi? Probably, given that they finished with a 67-15 record, second only to the record breaking Warriors, and were 26 games clear of missing the playoffs. In the past two years since LeBron has been in Cleveland, the Cavs record in games that LeBron doesn't play in is 4-13. Even with the talent of Kevin Love and Kyrie Irving, the LeBron-less Cavs have a win percentage of .235. That means, if they played an entire season without LeBron, their win total would be right around 19. A record of 19-63. The Cavs would be much closer to the first pick in the draft than raising a banner. Now, that record is a stretch because the team would take the necessary measures if they knew they would be without LeBron, but here's another fact. The Cavs did go from playoffs to first pick once already...when LeBron left for Miami. The following season, the Cavs had the league's worst record and drafted Kyrie Irving with the first pick.

    Would the current Warriors team go from first to worst with Stephen Curry? Absolutely not. During the regular season, Curry sat out the entire 4th quarter 18 times (4.5 games total) and the Warriors still finished with the best record in NBA history. With Stephen Curry missing a handful of games in the playoffs due to injury, the Warriors still moved on to the Conference Finals without so much as a hitch, losing only one game in their first two series, series in which Curry did not play a large portion of the games. The Warriors are fine without him.

Curry: First unanimous MVP in NBA history

    I, like LeBron am not taking anything away from Curry or Leonard. They are fantastic players who are deserving the awards they receive. I don't even think LeBron was necessarily going to bat for himself, like it's being portrayed. As an ambassador of the NBA, he sees a flaw. The Most Valuable Player award is misleading. There is a difference between the most valuable player and the best player, and all of our major American sports leagues are guilty of not making the distinction. If you would like to keep the award of Most Valuable Player, judge it the way you may judge Most Improved Player, or Sixth Man of the Year, because that's the kind of award in would be. Give the current MVP Award a new title. A more accurate title worthy of its stature: the Best Player Award or the Michael Jordan Award (similar to how the Hank Aaron Award goes to baseball's best hitter).

    A mix-up like this is an honest mistake and we shouldn't blame LeBron James or call him a sore loser just for pointing it out. LeBron is EXACTLY right in his comments. The MVP award needs a new name, and congratulations to Stephen Curry for being the NBA's Best Player in 2016.